Really you have to wonder exactly how scientific modern science really is sometimes. If peer-reviewers have a bias against anything that can't be patented and sold for billions of dollars then what affective therapies may be out there and not given the deserved research funds? I think open access is a good thing and hope to see it sticking around. People have a right to access information on their own whether it concerns medicine, climate, food, technology, and speech. Theres fraud present in all areas of life. The one existence of fakery in an area doesn't invalidate the reality in the rest of the area.
We must not confuse establishment ignorance with lack of evidence or intuitional misdirection. Its not merely us, but also the outward them that misunderstands true nature.